[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Industry environmental initiative waning -- evidencefrom33/50?
- Subject: RE: Industry environmental initiative waning -- evidencefrom33/50?
- From: "Melinda Dower" <Melinda.Dower@dep.state.nj.us>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 15:24:28 -0500
- Delivered-To: p2tech-archive@glc.org
- Delivered-To: p2tech@great-lakes.net
- List-Name: p2tech
- Reply-To: "Melinda Dower" <Melinda.Dower@dep.state.nj.us>
Not only were they overstated, many of the chemicals were banned and
therefore had to be replaced.
Melinda Dower
NJDEP
(609) 292-1122
>>> Program on Solid Waste Policy <pswp@yale.edu> 12/20/02 03:20PM >>>
I'm a little late in responding to this part of the thread, but I
thought
that it would be interesting nonetheless to note that careful analysis
of
the 33/50 program suggests that many of the reductions attributed to it
were overstated. See, the important article by Kathryn Harrison:
Harrison, K. 1998. "Talking with the Donkey: Cooperative Approaches
to
Environmental Protection" Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(2):
1-22. [available at <mitpress.mit.edu/JIE/sample_articles>]
Reid Lifset
Industrial Environmental Management Program
Yale University
At 09:56 AM 12/17/2002 -0500, Iannuzzi, Al [JJCUS] wrote:
>ok everyone - I work for industry and all I have to say is 33/50
program =
>824 million pounds of toxic chemical releases removed from the
>environment, Green Lights & energy Star = Over 6 billion square feet
of
>building space is now more energy efficient resulting in the
elimination
>of 10.5 billion pounds of carbon dioxide and significant amounts of
>nitrogen oxide, sulfur dioxide, particulates and toxic metals. All
>voluntary programs.
>
>Look at the annual environmental reports of companies - many are
>voluntarily reducing emissions. The question is - how can we get more
>firms to voluntarily reduce pollutants? Do we really think that going
>through the traditional regulatory process is the way to get more
improvement?
>
>Enforcement is necessary, but it is only a part of the picture. You
have
>to do both to improve the environment in today's climate.
>
>Al Iannuzzi
>WW Environmental Affairs
>732-524-6382
>Fax 3296
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Minicucci, Bob
>[<mailto:rminicucci@des.state.nh.us>mailto:rminicucci@des.state.nh.us]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:05 AM
>To: Melinda Dower; NPPR@great-lakes.net; P2Tech@great-lakes.net;
>Todd_MacFadden@uml.edu
>Subject: RE: Industry environmental initiative waning?
>
>What are we doing to encourage that 10% in the 'leadership' category
to
>become 20%, 50%, 98%? (It'll never be 100%, after all.)
>
>Bob Minicucci
>NH DES
>603-271-2941
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Melinda Dower
>[<mailto:Melinda.Dower@dep.state.nj.us>mailto:Melinda.Dower@dep.state.nj.us]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:00 AM
>To: NPPR@great-lakes.net; P2Tech@great-lakes.net;
Todd_MacFadden@uml.edu
>Subject: Re: Industry environmental initiative waning?
>
>Having been a "closet enforcer" for many years, I am heartened to see
>everyone's conclusions about the limited effectiveness of voluntary
>programs--I feel like I can come out of the closet now. Even here in
NJ,
>where P2 Planning is mandatory but implementation of P2 measures is
>
>voluntary, I have had numerous corporate representatives comment that
>they would be implementing much more P2 if it were mandatory.
>Regulations drive corporate behavior far more than anything voluntary
>(with the exception of the maybe 10% high performers who are doing
great
>P2 and have integrated P2 into their own performance measures).
>
>It is also important to note that government has not delivered on its
>promises to provide flexibility.
>
>Melinda Dower
>Research Scientist
>N.J. Department of Environmental Protection
>
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>p2tech is hosted by the Great Lakes Information Network:
><http://www.great-lakes.net>http://www.great-lakes.net
>To unsubscribe from this list: send mail to majordomo@great-lakes.net
>with the command 'unsubscribe p2tech' in the body of your message. No
>quotes or subject line are required.
>About :
><http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/p2tech/p2tech.info>http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/p2tech/p2tech.info
>
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
================================================================
Reid J. Lifset, Assoc. Dir. School of Forestry &
Env.
Studies
Industrial Environmental Mgmt. Program Yale University
Editor, Journal of Industrial Ecology 205 Prospect Street
203-432-6949 (tel) -5912 (fax) New Haven, CT
06511-2189 USA
reid.lifset@yale.edu
http://mitpress.mit.edu/JIE
----------------------------------------------------------
Program on Solid Waste Policy
School of Forestry and Environmental Studies
Yale University
205 Prospect Street
New Haven,CT 06511-2189 USA
203-432-3253 (telephone)
203-432-5912 (fax)
http://www.yale.edu/pswp
pswp@yale.edu
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
p2tech is hosted by the Great Lakes Information Network:
http://www.great-lakes.net
To unsubscribe from this list: send mail to majordomo@great-lakes.net
with the command 'unsubscribe p2tech' in the body of your message. No
quotes or subject line are required.
About : http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/p2tech/p2tech.info
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *